719-471-1984
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Accident Law
      • Car Accident Injuries
        • Car Crash FAQs
      • Truck Accident Injuries
        • Truck Accident FAQs
      • Colorado Bicycle Accident Lawyer
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Ski and Snowboard Accidents
    • Business Disputes
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
    • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment Law
    • Non-Compete Covenants
    • Professional Licensing
    • Uninsured Motorist Claims
    • Wrongful Death
  • Attorneys
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • CONTACT US
  • CALL US TODAY

Home » Blog » Supreme Court Debates When Lies Can Become Crimes In Stolen Valor Act Case

Supreme Court Debates When Lies Can Become Crimes In Stolen Valor Act Case

February 15, 2012 by Lance M. Sears

The Huffington Post reports that the Supreme Court seemed divided in a debate over whether or not it should strike down a federal law that makes it unlawful for a person to lie about receiving military honors.

In 2006, Congress passed the Stolen Valor Act, which states that “whoever falsely represents himself or herself, verbally or in writing, to have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the Armed Forces of the United States…shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than six months, or both.”

The Supreme Court’s debate revolved around a case that began five years ago. In 2007, a member of a Los Angeles-area water board, Xavier Alvarez, spoke at a public meeting saying, “Back in 1987, I was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor,” and claimed to be a retired Marine. Both of these claims were false. Alvarez became the first person to be convicted under the Stolen Valor Act.

Alvarez appealed his conviction, saying that the Act violates his First Amendment free speech rights. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit agreed in 2010, reversing the lower court and striking down the act. HuffPost said that “Since the Supreme Court consented to hear theUnited States vs. Alvarez this past fall, another appeals court has upheld the act, creating a split among the circuits.”

For the full story and the Justice’s debating comments, read The Huffington Post’s article here.

Filed Under: Blog Post, Legal

Schedule A Free Consultation

  • Free consultation does not apply to employment matters.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

From the blog

  • Sears and Associates Sponsors Tierra Plan/CP Racing
  • Colorado Springs Bike Master Plan
  • Types of Bicycle Accidents
  • 5 Things Truck Drivers Do That Lead to Serious Injury
more posts

Copyright ©  | Sears & Associates, PC.
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2019 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • About Us
    ►
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    ►
    • Personal Injury
    • Accident Law
    • Business Disputes
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
    • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment Law
    • Non-Compete Covenants
    • Professional Licensing
    • Uninsured Motorist Claims
    • Wrongful Death
  • Attorneys
    ►
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact