719-471-1984
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Accident Law
      • Car Accident Injuries
        • Car Crash FAQs
      • Uninsured Motorist Claims
      • Truck Accident Injuries
        • Truck Accident FAQs
      • Bicycle Accidents
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Ski and Snowboard Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
      • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment / Business Litigation
      • Employment Law
      • Business Disputes
      • Non-Compete Covenants
      • Professional Licensing
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
  • Attorneys
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • CONTACT US
  • CALL US TODAY

Home » Blog » Supreme Court Ruled State Can’t Be Sued Under FMLA For Refusing Employee Recovery Time

Supreme Court Ruled State Can’t Be Sued Under FMLA For Refusing Employee Recovery Time

April 11, 2013 by Lance M. Sears

CBS Washington reports that the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 vote that states cannot be sued for refusing to give employees time off to recover from an illness. The Court’s decision will not let Daniel Coleman sue the Maryland State Court of Appeals for damages for firing him after he requested sick leave. He “blamed Congress for not equating family care and self-care when lawmakers wrote the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).”

Coleman had asked for a medical leave of 10 days in 2007 to deal with hypertension and diabetes. After being what he said was wrongfully fired after his request was denied, he sued for $1.1 million in damages under the FMLA, but his lawsuit was thrown out, and the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said states could not be sued under the FMLA.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote for the Supreme Court’s majority, said, “An explicit purpose of the Congress in adopting the FMLA was to improve workplace conditions for women. But states may not be subjected to suits for damages based on violations of a comprehensive statute unless Congress has identified a specific pattern of constitutional violations by state employers.”

The case is Coleman vs. Court of Appeals of Maryland, 10-1016.

Filed Under: Blog Post, Employee Law, Legal, Workers' Compensation

Schedule A Free Consultation

  • Free consultation does not apply to employment matters.

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

From the blog

  • Roundabouts Are Here to Stay in Colorado: Here's Why
  • Colorado Passes 2021 Medical Lien Legislation to Protect Injured Plaintiffs
  • Back On The Table: Direct Negligence Claims Against Employers For The Negligence Of Their Employees
  • Can an Employer Require its Employees to get the COVID-19 Vaccine?
more posts

Copyright ©  | Sears & Associates, PC.
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Sears & Associates on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • About Us
    ►
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    ►
    • Personal Injury
    • Accident Law
    • Employment / Business Litigation
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
  • Attorneys
    ►
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact