719-471-1984
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Accident Law
      • Car Accident Injuries
        • Car Crash FAQs
      • Uninsured Motorist Claims
      • Truck Accident Injuries
        • Truck Accident FAQs
      • Bicycle Accidents
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Ski and Snowboard Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
      • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment / Business Litigation
      • Employment Law
      • Business Disputes
      • Non-Compete Covenants
      • Professional Licensing
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
  • Attorneys
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • CONTACT US
  • CALL US TODAY

Home » Blog » Sixth Circuit of Appeals Allows Whistleblower Suit to Proceed

Sixth Circuit of Appeals Allows Whistleblower Suit to Proceed

September 5, 2012 by Lance M. Sears

Public Justice reports that the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has “held in Rhodes v. R & L Carriers, Inc., that a Ohio whistleblower’s retaliation and discrimination case against his former employer was improperly dismissed — and that the plaintiff is entitled to his day in court.”

The case, brought by Eugene Rhodes, was filed against his employer, R & L Carriers, Inc., an Ohio based shipping company, in 2009. In his complaint, Mr. Rhodes claimed he found that R & L Carriers refused to hire women for certain jobs, overlooked some instances of sexual harassment, lower pay for females, age discrimination, handicapped discrimination, and retaliation against employees who took family and medical leave.

Mr. Rhodes claims that when he objected to these practices, he was told that no changes would be made, since the company “had never had to write a big enough check” to bother with anti-discrimination laws. He was eventually fired.

Mr. Rhodes’ lawsuit alleges that he was illegally retaliated against by R & L and fired because of his age and because he reported the discriminatory offenses. The False Claims Acts protects whistleblowers from being fired for their claims of wrongful behavior.

The case was initially dismissed in court, but attorneys from the Public Justice Foundation successfully appealed the case, and the Sixth Circuit Court allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

This appeals decision was a major victory for Public Justice’s Iqbal project, an effort to ensure that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Ashcroft v. Iqbal ruling is not improperly used to abuse the plaintiff’s rights.

Filed Under: Appeals, Blog Post, Legal

Schedule A Free Consultation

  • Free consultation does not apply to employment matters.

  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

From the blog

  • Roundabouts Are Here to Stay in Colorado: Here's Why
  • Colorado Passes 2021 Medical Lien Legislation to Protect Injured Plaintiffs
  • Back On The Table: Direct Negligence Claims Against Employers For The Negligence Of Their Employees
  • Can an Employer Require its Employees to get the COVID-19 Vaccine?
more posts

Copyright ©  | Sears & Associates, PC.
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Sears & Associates on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • About Us
    ►
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    ►
    • Personal Injury
    • Accident Law
    • Employment / Business Litigation
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
  • Attorneys
    ►
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact