719-471-1984
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Accident Law
      • Car Accident Injuries
        • Car Crash FAQs
      • Truck Accident Injuries
        • Truck Accident FAQs
      • Colorado Bicycle Accident Lawyer
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Ski and Snowboard Accidents
    • Business Disputes
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
    • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment Law
    • Non-Compete Covenants
    • Professional Licensing
    • Uninsured Motorist Claims
    • Wrongful Death
  • Attorneys
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • CONTACT US
  • CALL US TODAY

Home » Blog » Supreme Court rules parents can’t sue over side effects from vaccines

Supreme Court rules parents can’t sue over side effects from vaccines

February 24, 2011 by Lance M. Sears

The US Supreme Court decided yesterday in a 6-to-2 decision that parents cannot sue the manufacturers of immunizations over side effects from the shots their babies receive.

Russel and Robalee Bruesewitz are parents of an infant that allegedly suffered a severe reaction to a vaccine. USA Today reports that the suit originated in Pennsylvania and was brought against Wyeth, now owned by Pfizer, when Russel and Robalee’s daughter, Hannah, began having seizures after she was injected with a Wyeth-made vaccine. Hannah is now 19 years old, but has developmentally impaired since she received the vaccine at 6 months old.

But the high court ruled that the Bruesewitz’s lawsuit was preempted under National Childhood Vaccine Act of 1986. The law grants drug companies immunity from certain lawsuits tied to vaccinations.

The family had gone to a vaccine court, but the suit had been thrown out of the lower court, and now that Supreme Court has affirmed that decision. Chief Justice John Roberts, justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia made up the majority of the vote, justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor were in dissent. Justice Elena Kagan had no part of the decision.

The dissenting judges wrote that the decision “leaves a regulatory vacuum in which no one ensures that vaccine manufacturers adequately take account of scientific and technological advancements when designing and distributing their products.”

Amy Schulman, Executive Vice President of Pfizer, praised the decision, says USA Today. Schulman says that “expert federal agencies” should determine “the optimal design of lifesaving childhood vaccines.”

Regardless of the decision, immunizations still offer children the best chance of protection from infectious diseases.

Filed Under: Blog Post, Malpractice, Medicine

Schedule A Free Consultation

  • Free consultation does not apply to employment matters.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

From the blog

  • Sears and Associates Sponsors Tierra Plan/CP Racing
  • Colorado Springs Bike Master Plan
  • Types of Bicycle Accidents
  • 5 Things Truck Drivers Do That Lead to Serious Injury
more posts

Copyright ©  | Sears & Associates, PC.
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2019 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • About Us
    ►
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    ►
    • Personal Injury
    • Accident Law
    • Business Disputes
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
    • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment Law
    • Non-Compete Covenants
    • Professional Licensing
    • Uninsured Motorist Claims
    • Wrongful Death
  • Attorneys
    ►
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact