719-471-1984
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Accident Law
      • Car Accident Injuries
        • Car Crash FAQs
      • Uninsured Motorist Claims
      • Truck Accident Injuries
        • Truck Accident FAQs
      • Bicycle Accidents
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Ski and Snowboard Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
      • Spinal & Brain Injuries
    • Employment / Business Litigation
      • Employment Law
      • Business Disputes
      • Non-Compete Covenants
      • Professional Licensing
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
  • Attorneys
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • CONTACT US
  • CALL US TODAY

Home » Blog » Supreme Court to Hear Wal-Mart Appeal and Consider Class-Action Status

Supreme Court to Hear Wal-Mart Appeal and Consider Class-Action Status

December 22, 2011 by Lance M. Sears

Retail giant Wal-Mart is being sued by a group of female employees claiming discrimination. They are accusing Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club of paying women “less than men in comparable positions, despite having higher performance ratings and greater seniority.” According to Time.com, the suit also claims use of sexist language used by executives. Only six women originally filed this suit in 2001, but as of December 2010, between 500,000 and 1.5 million women are involved in the “largest workplace-bias lawsuit in US history.”

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal and to decide if the case can advance as a class action lawsuit. The appeal is not to decide if there was in fact discrimination, but whether individual claims may be combined as a class action suit. This decision by the Supreme Court is sure to impact a large number of class action suits as well as womens rights. Wal-Mart is trying to stop the suit because they say “allowing the large number of claims to go forward would set off an avalanche of similar class action lawsuits.”

The petition Wal-Mart submitted to the court says that “the complaint seeks conjunctive relief, back pay, and punitive damages; it does not seek compensatory damages or retroactive promotions.”

Filed Under: Blog Post, Employee Law

Schedule A Free Consultation

  • Free consultation does not apply to employment matters.

  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

From the blog

  • Roundabouts Are Here to Stay in Colorado: Here's Why
  • Colorado Passes 2021 Medical Lien Legislation to Protect Injured Plaintiffs
  • Back On The Table: Direct Negligence Claims Against Employers For The Negligence Of Their Employees
  • Can an Employer Require its Employees to get the COVID-19 Vaccine?
more posts

Copyright ©  | Sears & Associates, PC.
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Sears & Associates on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • About Us
    ►
    • Colorado’s Premier Law Firm
    • In the News
    • Video Library
    • Wounded Warrior Project
  • Practice Areas
    ►
    • Personal Injury
    • Accident Law
    • Employment / Business Litigation
    • Unreasonable Delay or Denial of Claims
  • Attorneys
    ►
    • Lance Michael Sears
    • Hollie Lynn Wieland
  • Blog
  • Contact